5 SIMPLE STATEMENTS ABOUT HODGDON H335 RIFLE POWDER EXPLAINED

5 Simple Statements About hodgdon h335 rifle powder Explained

5 Simple Statements About hodgdon h335 rifle powder Explained

Blog Article

DroopyBassets75 reported: Thanks for the tips on People bullets. The only cause why I am utilizing these is always that I already experienced them loaded up for an AR along with a Mini-fourteen and nonetheless have a thousand or so unfastened 55 grain Hornady FMJ bullets to use.

also midwest powders WC844 which I've a bunch of. It pops up on American Reloading every single now and again

This is why I do not buy off brand name discount bullets, and why I don't buy bullets from suppliers that don't offer data or at the least facts and suggestions like Xtreme does.

You will get an e-mail each Friday early morning featuring the latest chatter from the most well liked subject areas, breaking news bordering laws, together with unique deals only available to ARFCOM e mail subscribers.

Should you have any fired conditions of your respective ammo lying around, I advise you weigh them. Military services brass (five.56mm) can be as many as ten% heavier, which means minimized volume and higher strain. It will probably also characteristic a armed forces crimp in the primer pocket that has to be swaged (there's a Resource for that) in advance of reloading the conditions.

Include to estimate Only show this person #4 · Sep eight, 2016 Here is a website link to some DuPont archive file that demonstrates IMR powders and consists of Remington bullets. It really is outdated data. Take note that the images from the powder are from the previous sq. cans.

Rebs, your didn't discover what grain bullet you might be dealing with. I have discovered H335 to become an Outstanding powder for 55gr bullets, but dismal for heavier bullets like SMK sixty nine/77gr bullets.

I had about 250 items of Lake City (LC) 5.56 NATO brass currently prepped and able to load. Quite a few reviews condition that army instances are heavier than business brass. I’ve weighed numerous hundred pieces possessing different headstamps and concluded, normally, the main difference in ballistic effectiveness is negligible.

This isn’t strange as I’ve noticed the disparity in load tips through my forty several years of reloading. But it really doesn’t damage to inquire.

H335 performs wonderful with conventional tiny rifle primers. My AR likes 25gr below a normal 55gr ball rounds.

Add to quote Only show this user #8 · Nov twenty five, 2014 Sorry gdmoody I am even now Finding out,,, is the web site from Hodgdon the just one I have to be considering may be the XTB info the a single I ought to use for that TTSX or is there another which you have been specking of

I reload over a progressive Dillon RL550B whose computerized powder measure is renown for not liking stick powders. Numerous a long time in the past I switched h335 223 load data to typically ball or small Slash powders and H335 is really a mainstay powder for loads from 223 to 45-70. And that's why the apart is significant to me.

1) Begin employing bullet company's data instead of generic. Hodgdon For several years stated loads only by bullet bodyweight with no reference to varied bullet varieties of same fat. I understand their on-line reloading data now references whose bullet with the data.

Quoted: I voted H335 I exploit a bunch of the stuff for 3gun/Opposition/plinking ammo. Want it below Wolf 55gr projectiles. Hornady 55gr functions very good much too. The Wolfs are a bit a lot more accurate while in the loads I take advantage of however. Light-weight loads for Opposition @ 22.6gr & two.245" OAL in quite a few headstamps of brass. The load is in keeping with all big headstamps if you kind them. These are generally light-weight loads. Be intelligent and operate all the way down to them if you are trying them.

Report this page